Hong Kong activists make final appeal for special election touted as referendum on reform

By Min Lee, AP
Friday, May 14, 2010

HK democracy activists make final appeal for votes

HONG KONG — Five Hong Kong democracy activists made a final appeal to voters Saturday before a special election they triggered as an attempt to pressure Beijing to make political reforms in this former British colony.

Beijing opposes Sunday’s election as a challenge to its authority, and Hong Kong’s leader said he and his senior officials won’t vote in the contest.

The five activists, former legislators representing each of Hong Kong’s five major electoral districts, resigned from their seats in January. Their plan was to engineer a special election where they would compete against pro-Beijing candidates, effectively setting up a de facto territory-wide referendum on democracy.

But with the Chinese government questioning the campaign, Beijing loyalists in Hong Kong decided to boycott the election. As a result, the five activists are expected to easily win against a smattering of unknown candidates. Now, the focus has shifted to voter turnout.

Political analysts say turnout will be low because of the pro-China boycott. But the five former lawmakers say that if their base — which they estimate at 25 percent of Hong Kong’s 3.4 million registered voters — turns out to vote, they will consider the campaign a success.

“That would be a mandate,” Albert Chan, one of the five legislators who resigned, said on the sidelines of a rally late Friday.

The activists received a boost Saturday from Anson Chan, formerly Hong Kong’s No. 2 official and one of the territory’s most popular politicians. Chan, dubbed by supporters as “Hong Kong’s conscience,” campaigned with ex-legislator Tanya Chan on Hong Kong Island.

“If we don’t want Hong Kong to become a city where free expression is muzzled, if we don’t want to suffer from intimidation, we must exercise our votes tomorrow and send the government a clear message,” Anson Chan said.

The activists want full democracy in Hong Kong. As part of its semi-autonomous status under Chinese rule, Hong Kong enjoys Western-style civil liberties, but its leader is chosen by an 800-member committee with a pro-Beijing bias. The 60-member legislature is half-elected, half-chosen by interest groups, many of whom represent the business sector.

About 1,000 supporters attended the rally late Friday, blowing whistles and chanting slogans like “I want universal suffrage” and “The people raise their heads.” They sang along with a performance of John Lennon’s “Power to the People.”

Hong Kong leader Donald Tsang announced in a statement released late Friday that he and his top political appointees — including cabinet secretaries and deputy secretaries — won’t vote in the by-election. Tsang said he believes that many residents consider the poll unnecessary and a waste of taxpayer dollars.

Anson Chan blasted Tsang for skipping the election.

“I’ve never heard of a political leader leading the boycott of a legally organized election,” she said.

Discussion
July 1, 2010: 10:37 pm

Do we need a Referendum For A New Democracy?

Are you concerned about the future of democracy? Do you feel democracy is under attack by extreme greed in countries around the world? Are you sick and tired of: living in fear, corporate greed, growing police state, government for the rich, working more but having less?

Can we use both elections and random selection (in the way we select government officials) to rid democracy of undue influence by extreme wealth and wealth-dominated mass media campaigns?

The world’s first democracy (Athenian democracy, 600 B.C.) used both elections and random selection. Even Aristotle (the cofounder of Western thought) promoted the use random selection as the best way to protect democracy. The idea of randomly selecting (after screening) juries remains from Athenian democracy, but not randomly selecting (after screening) government officials. Why is it used only for individual justice and not also for social justice? Who wins from that? …the extremely wealthy?

What is the best way to combine elections and random selection to protect democracy in today’s world? Can we use elections as the way to screen candidates, and random selection as the way to do the final selection? Who wins from that? …the people?

YOUR VIEW POINT
NAME : (REQUIRED)
MAIL : (REQUIRED)
will not be displayed
WEBSITE : (OPTIONAL)
YOUR
COMMENT :