Top European rights watchdog hints Swiss minaret ban could be overturned
By Frank Jordans, APMonday, November 30, 2009
Rights watchdog hints Swiss minaret ban could go
GENEVA — A Swiss ban on minarets could violate fundamental liberties, Europe’s top human-rights watchdog said Monday in an indication that the heavily criticized vote could be overturned.
The Council of Europe said banning “new minarets in Switzerland raises concerns as to whether fundamental rights of individuals, protected by international treaties, should be subject to popular votes.”
The statement by the 47-nation council’s secretary-general, Thorbjorn Jagland, suggests a case may be made to seek a ruling by the European Court of Human Rights condemning Switzerland for violating freedom of expression, freedom of religion and prohibition of discrimination.
Swiss Justice Minister Eveline Widmer-Schlumpf said the ban would come into force immediately, but also indicated that the court could strike down the Sunday vote, which incurred swift condemnation at home and abroad for banning the towers used to put out the Islamic call to prayer.
“The ban contradicts the European Convention on Human Rights,” Zurich daily Blick cited Widmer-Schlumpf as saying, referring to the 1950 treaty laying out basic rights that the court in Strasbourg, France, was created to ensure member states abide by.
The referendum backed by nationalist parties was approved by 57.5 percent of the population Sunday, forcing the government to declare illegal the building of any new minarets in Switzerland. It doesn’t affect the country’s four existing minarets.
France’s Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner said he was “a bit scandalized” by the vote, which amounts to “oppressing a religion.”
“I hope that the Swiss will go back on this decision rather quickly,” Kouchner said on France’s RTL radio. “It is an expression of intolerance, and I detest intolerance.”
The U.N.’s special investigator on religious freedom, Asma Jahangir, said the ban on new minarets constitutes “a clear discrimination against members of the Muslim community in Switzerland.”
Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu, the secretary general of the Organization of the Islamic Conference, called the ban an “example of growing anti-Islamic incitement in Europe by the extremist, anti-immigrant, xenophobic, racist, scare-mongering ultra-right politicians who reign over common sense, wisdom and universal values.”
Wealthy Arab tourists might think twice now about spending their money in Geneva and other Swiss cities popular with visitors from the Gulf, and the neutral country’s efforts to mediate in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict could also suffer, said Daniel Warner, a Swiss-American political scientist at the Graduate Institute in Geneva.
Arriving at a meeting of European Union justice ministers, Widmer-Schlumpf argued the vote was not “a referendum against Islam … but a vote directed against fundamentalist developments.”
She defended the referendum as being “about minarets and not, of course, about the Islamic community,” she said. “We are interested in a multi-religious society in Switzerland.”
Supporters of the ban said the number of Muslims in Switzerland had grown sharply from 50,000 in 1980, but it is still only 4 percent of the 7.5 million population, many of whom don’t practice. Western Europe has an estimated 14 million Muslims.
Voting figures showed a rural-urban split in the Swiss vote, with only 38.6 percent of people in major cities backing the ban compared with about two-thirds of the population in smaller towns and villages, officials said.
Anne-Marie Birnstiel, in the wealthy Alpine town of Gstaad told AP Television News she was disappointed by the vote and afraid of the consequences for Switzerland.
But, fellow town resident Anton Seil told APTN that “we are in Switzerland, and if I go to another country I also can’t build up my church or represent my faith. So, they have to adapt to us in Switzerland too.”
Switzerland isn’t alone in expressing fears about a growing Muslim population, though it is the only country where voters can easily enact constitutional amendments through referendums.
France, too, has enacted laws that Muslims claim are directed at them, including a ban on the wearing of religious symbols, such as headscarves, in schools.
A leader of Italy’s Northern League party, a key ally in Premier Silvio Berlusconi’s conservative coalition, said: “Unfortunately we are faced with a strong attack on (our Christian) identity by an intolerant religion like Islam is.” He said he advocated putting a symbol of a cross on the Italian flag.
The Roman Catholic Church, however, condemned the vote.
Monsignor Antonio Maria Veglio, a Vatican official with the Pontifical Council on Migrants, told the Italian news agency ANSA that he shared the position taken by Swiss bishops who called the vote a “hard blow to religious freedom and immigration.”
Overnight, opponents of the minaret ban lit candles in front of the Swiss parliament in Bern and hung up banners saying “This is not my Switzerland.”
In Zurich, unknown people smashed a glass door of the offices of the nationalist Swiss People’s Party — which had backed the ban — cantonal (state) police said.
____
Associated Press writers Robert Wielaard in Brussels, Rod McGuirk in Jakarta, Ingrid Rousseau in Paris, Maamoun Youssef in Cairo, Zeina Karam in Beirut, Frances D’Emilio in Rome and APTN producer Dorothee Thiesing in Gstaad contributed to this report.
Tags: Europe, France, Geneva, International Agreements, Islam, Italy, Nationalism, North America, Religious Issues, Switzerland, United States, Western Europe
December 1, 2009: 8:47 pm
Swiss people have exercised their rights. They do not want their country to become Swissstan. Minarets are not about religion - they are about domination. Well done. |
euro