US Justice Department still sees legal problems in Google’s digital book settlement

By Michael Liedtke, AP
Thursday, February 4, 2010

DOJ still troubled by Google’s digital book deal

SAN FRANCISCO — The U.S. Justice Department still thinks a proposal to give Google the digital rights to millions of hard-to-find books threatens to stifle competition and undermine copyright laws, despite revisions aimed at easing those concerns.

The opinion filed Thursday in New York federal court is a significant setback in Google’s effort to win approval of a 15-month-old legal settlement that would put the Internet search leader in charge of a vast electronic library and store.

A diverse mix of Google rivals, consumer watchdogs, academic experts, literary agents, state governments and even foreign governments have already urged U.S. District Judge Denny Chin to reject the agreement.

The Justice Department’s perspective presumably will carry more weight with Chin, given its position as the chief U.S. law enforcement agency.

In its 26-page brief, the Justice Department praised the revised settlement for making “substantial progress.”

But the government advised Chin that the agreement still oversteps the legal boundaries of a class-action settlement, describing its manipulation of U.S. copyright law as a “bridge too far.” The Justice Department also raised concerns that Google’s partnership with the participating U.S. publishers could turn into a literary cartel that would wield too much power over book prices.

Despite its misgivings, the Justice Department urged the parties to take another stab at making changes that would eliminate its legal concerns.

In a statement, Google spokesman Gabriel Stricker gave no indication whether the company is willing to revise the settlement again.

“The Department of Justice’s filing recognizes the progress made with the revised settlement, and it once again reinforces the value the agreement can provide in unlocking access to millions of books in the U.S.,” Stricker said.

Chin has scheduled a Feb. 18 hearing to consider approving the class-action settlement.

YOUR VIEW POINT
NAME : (REQUIRED)
MAIL : (REQUIRED)
will not be displayed
WEBSITE : (OPTIONAL)
YOUR
COMMENT :