US warns Japan to loosen child custody laws or risk hurting relations between the allies

By Malcolm Foster, AP
Tuesday, February 2, 2010

US warns Japan child custody laws could harm ties

TOKYO — Steve Christie cannot see his son because his Japanese ex-wife has sole custody, a typical arrangement in Japan. He is one of about 70 American parents in that position, and the U.S. warned Tokyo on Tuesday that it must revise its family laws or risk hurting ties between the two longtime allies.

Laws that allow only one parent to have custody of children in cases of divorce — nearly always the mother — set Japan apart from most other developed countries. They also leave most fathers, including foreigners, unable to see their children until they are grown.

“This matter has raised very real concerns among senior and prominent Americans in Congress, on Capitol Hill and elsewhere,” U.S. Assistant Secretary of State Kurt Campbell told reporters in Tokyo after meeting with affected American parents in Japan. He called their predicament “heartbreaking.”

Campbell’s comments are the sternest warning yet from Washington on the issue and signal that it has risen on the U.S. government’s priority list — at a time when ties are already strained by a dispute over moving a U.S. Marine base on the Japanese island of Okinawa.

“It’s been striking to me at how rapidly this issue has gained support in Congress,” he said.

While affirming the importance of Washington’s ties with Tokyo, Campbell said Japan needs to take steps to “avoid a situation where this in any way complicates the smooth running and the important nature of our overall strategic relationship.”

In some cases, when marriages have soured, Japanese mothers living overseas with their foreign husbands have returned home with their children and kept the fathers from having any contact with the kids, even if court rulings abroad ordered joint custody — an act Campbell likened to “kidnapping.”

The issue gained attention last fall when American Christopher Savoie, whose Japanese ex-wife Noriko fled Tennessee with their kids without telling him or getting court permission. Savoie was arrested last fall after he snatched the children from her on a Japanese street.

He was eventually released and allowed to return to the U.S. on condition he leave his children behind even though a U.S. court gave him full custody of the kids when Noriko fled.

The new priority placed on the matter by Washington is welcomed by Christie, an American university instructor in Japan who met with Campbell Tuesday. He has rarely seen his son since his wife, with whom he has since divorced, suddenly left with the boy four years ago. The first three years, he had no idea where his son was, he said.

“This is our life and blood, this is our offspring, and we’re being denied a chance to see them,” said Christie, 50. “It’s not right, it’s immoral, it’s unethical. What amazes me is for how long it’s been going on in this country.”

Japanese fathers are largely resigned to this setup because of the cultural assumption that kids should be raised by mothers, although some are starting to push for changes to Japanese family law to allow joint custody.

Campbell urged that Japan join the Hague Convention on International Child Abduction, signed by 80 nations, which is meant to address international custody battles, adding to recent pressure from Britain, Australia, France and several other countries.

Japan is the only Group of Seven nation that hasn’t signed the convention, arguing that it could endanger Japanese women and their children trying to flee abusive foreign husbands.

But Campbell said that based on U.S. examination of international custody cases, “that allegation is used very loosely and often inappropriately without any supporting criteria whatsoever.”

Kazuaki Kameda, who heads a department of child custody issues set up at the Foreign Ministry in December, declined to comment on Campbell’s remarks.

During his meeting with the American “left-behind” parents, as they call themselves, Campbell said that if Japan didn’t make changes within four months on the issue, Washington would ratchet up the pressure on the Japanese government, Christie said.

“He said that we should be expecting changes, and that if we don’t see significant changes, more actions will be taken,” Christie added.

U.S. Embassy officials declined to confirm Campbell’s comments, but the secretary said he raised the issue with Japanese counterparts Tuesday, and said he sensed a recognition in Tokyo’s new government, which replaced the long-ruling conservatives last fall, that steps needed to be taken. He said the two countries had set up a series of meetings to address the issue.

“Japan’s new leadership is willing to look at these things in a new light,” he said.

Christie said he was encouraged that Washington was taking up the issue more seriously.

“We’re hopeful now because we’re getting a much more appropriate response from our government,” he said.

Discussion
February 23, 2010: 11:42 am

Nice refreshing blog on the subject of Child Custody!

YOUR VIEW POINT
NAME : (REQUIRED)
MAIL : (REQUIRED)
will not be displayed
WEBSITE : (OPTIONAL)
YOUR
COMMENT :