Ethics committee admonishes Sen. Burris of Ill. in letter, but recommends no punishment

By Larry Margasak, AP
Friday, November 20, 2009

Ethics committee: No punishment for Burris

WASHINGTON — The Senate ethics committee on Friday admonished Democratic Sen. Roland Burris for misleading investigators about his maneuvering to get Barack Obama’s old Senate seat from the governor who was ousted for trying to sell it.

Burris was appointed by disgraced former Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich, who was impeached and driven from office after he was accused of trying to sell the seat.

The committee placed special emphasis on a phone conversation between Burris and the governor’s brother, where Burris linked his willingness to raise funds for the governor with his desire for appointment to the Senate.

While finding no violation of law, the committee’s “Public Letter of Qualified Admonition” told Burris that “senators must meet a much higher standard of conduct” than he exhibited with his constantly changing statements.

The ethics committee has often been criticized for failing to go beyond letters of admonition after finding a senator’s conduct discredited the institution.

The letter had tough wording, telling Burris that he provided “inconsistent, misleading or incomplete information” to the public, the Senate and investigators; and that his conduct “reflected unfavorably on the Senate.”

Senate Democratic leaders, however, expressed no desire to hand out further punishment.

Jim Manley, spokesman for Majority Leader Harry Reid, said, “The ethics committee handled its independent investigation, and its letter of qualified admonition speaks for itself.”

Joe Shoemaker, spokesman for second-ranking Senate Democrat Dick Durbin, said the senior Illinois senator would not go beyond his statement that the ethics panel admonishment speaks for itself.

Durbin’s statement said that Senate Democratic leaders made clear to Burris that in order to be seated, “he needed to appear before the Illinois General Assembly to testify openly, honestly and completely about the nature of his relationship with the former governor, his associates and the circumstances surrounding this appointment.

“Since then, the accuracy and completeness of his testimony and affidavits have been called into question. The U.S. Senate Ethics Committee has completed its review into this matter and found that Sen. Burris’ actions have brought discredit on him and the Senate.”

Burris commented, “I am pleased that after numerous investigations, this matter has finally come to a close. I thank the members of the Senate Ethics Committee for their fair and thorough review of this matter, and now look forward to continuing the important work ahead on behalf of the people of Illinois.”

Weakened and facing multiple primary challengers next spring, Burris has decided not to fight for a full Senate term next year. Fellow Democrats shun him. Meanwhile, the former governor is scheduled to go to trial in June.

The ethics committee was especially critical of Burris’ comments during the Nov. 13, 2008, phone call from the governor’s brother.

While Robert Blagojevich explicitly told Burris he was calling to raise campaign funds for the governor, the committee’s letter to Burris said “you appeared to agree to write a check and even potentially raise money”; and “repeatedly brought up your desire to seek the Senate seat.

“You also implied that the people you might raise money from would be unhappy if you did not receive the appointment,” the committee wrote. The committee found the conversation “inappropriate in its content and implications.”

The letter also was critical of Burris’ shifting explanations about his contacts with the governor or his representatives.

The committee found:

—In his Jan. 5, 2009, affidavit to the Illinois House of Representatives, Burris said he did not have contact with Gov. Blagojevich or any of his representatives about an appointment to the Senate before Dec. 26, 2008. Burris was appointed to the Senate by Blagojevich four days later.

—In his Jan. 8, 2009, testimony before the committee to impeach the governor, Burris — despite repeated questions on the subject — did not disclose having any conversations about his desire to seek the appointment, or about fundraising, with anyone associated with the governor except former Blagojevich top aide Lon Monk.

—It was not until Burris’ second affidavit and subsequent press statements that the senator disclosed additional contacts with associates of the governor.

“You gave multiple and at times contradictory explanations for failing to disclose all your contacts with the governor’s associates, which individually and collectively gave the appearance that you were being less than candid,” the ethics panel wrote.

The committee said that in deciding to go no further than the letter, it considered that a county prosecutor found Burris’ sworn statements did not violate the law.

“We were also aware that these issues surrounding your appointment to and seating in the Senate have been subject to intense public criticism,” the committee said.

YOUR VIEW POINT
NAME : (REQUIRED)
MAIL : (REQUIRED)
will not be displayed
WEBSITE : (OPTIONAL)
YOUR
COMMENT :