48 states, D.C. to Supreme Court: Funeral protests shouldn’t get 1st Amendment protection
By APTuesday, June 1, 2010
48 states: Funeral protests shouldn’t be protected
WASHINGTON — Forty-eight states and the District of Columbia have submitted a brief to the Supreme Court in support of a father who sued anti-gay protesters over their demonstration at the 2006 funeral of his son, a Marine killed in Iraq.
Only Virginia and Maine declined to sign the brief by the Kansas attorney general.
Albert Snyder sued over protests by the Kansas-based Westboro Baptist Church at his son’s funeral in Maryland. The church pickets funerals because they believe war deaths are punishment for U.S. tolerance of homosexuality.
The Supreme Court has agreed to consider whether the protesters’ message is protected by the First Amendment.
In the brief filed Tuesday, the states argued they have a compelling interest in protecting the sanctity of funerals.
Tags: Funerals And Memorial Services, North America, Protests And Demonstrations, United States, Washington
|
June 9, 2010: 5:31 am
Death of one person takes a little from everyone is the family. At this time life seems to be upsetting and it seems that things will never go right again. |
Funeral messages